Published on:

Often times, a frustrated Texas lemon law client will seek my advice on what they should do when taking in their new vehicle to the service center for repairs. Last week a client of mine from Houston, Texas was so frustrated with the Chrysler service manager, that he threatened to leave his truck parked at the dealership until they fix the “check engine light” problem.

I hear it often, the client will say, “every time I take in my car/truck, they tell me they can’t find anything wrong with it… they tell me they can not duplicate the problem and put NPF… no problem found on the repair invoice.”

My response to the client starts off with the following quote by Albert Einstein: “Insanity, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

In the case of dealerships and service centers, it is important that the client or consumer be prepared BEFORE bringing the vehicle in to be looked at. I suggest the following:

Take photographs or video camera recordings of the vehicle’s defect. Bring the photograph or video and show it to the service manager of the car dealership. For example, if it is an intermittent noise issue and the service manager has been unenthusiastic in replicating the problem, then showing this “video” evidence will help the service manager swallow his or her own words.

In this day and age, the consumer or client has no excuse not to have proof of their complaint,…a cheap cell phone should likely have a camera or camcorder functionality built into it.

For photographs, make sure that you keep track of when the picture was taken — having a date and time stamp on the photo is recommended. For video recordings, make sure you state your name, the date, the time, the description of the vehicle, and the current mileage on the vehicle.
Continue reading

Published on:

Each time you take your vehicle into the manufacturer, ever notice how the repair invoices you receive are stated a specific way? Most often, it will start off by stating “customer states…” Also, ever notice how the repair invoices are worded in a way that is mostly true, but not 100% accurate? Inaccurate repair invoices written by car manufacturers is perhaps the biggest reason that consumers in Texas lose when filing a Texas Lemon Law claim or lawsuit.

Service managers and employees who work for the service department of each manufacturer’s car dealership have been trained, if not over-trained, on how to write these repair invoices. Why? This is to protect the vehicle manufacturer and dealership.

In case you decide to open a Texas Lemon Law claim or file a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices (DTPA) lawsuit, these entities will already be 100 steps ahead of you. They have been prepared to be sued before you actually have purchased or brought your vehicle in for repairs.

Published on:

I am currently working on a Texas Lemon Law case against Chrylser and have been searching several databases for information regarding engine-related defects in Chrysler cars. I stumbled upon this frequently asked question (faq) document drafted in part by allpar and thought I will post a segment of the faq for those who may be interested in reading this information about Chrysler vehicles.

Please be advised that this posting is not legal advice. Each case is different. If you suspect that you may have a viable new Chrysler lemon vehicle, then you should contact an attorney as soon as possible. Keep in mind that there are Texas Lemon Law statute of limitations. My Law Office is not responsible for any action, if any, that is taken as a result of this faq.

To read the Chrysler faq, click here => Download file

Published on:

Toyota‘s recent recall regarding the uncontrollable acceleration of its vehicles has led many Toyota car owners to contact my Texas Lemon Law office for recourse. Most consumers ask if it is possible for them to get an automatic buyback, due to the recall. The answer is “it depends.”

Texas Lemon Law has a set of strict guidelines — the consumer’s situation must fit within those guidelines to be eligible for a potential lemon law buyback. Moreover, the Texas Lemon Law is never definitive because it is subject to an administrative judge’s ruling.

In general, the lemon law requires that the consumer have taken the vehicle in at least 4 times unsuccessfully within the first 24,000 miles or 24 months, whichever occurs first. If the problem is considered a serious safety matter, then the law only requires 2 times. Toyota’s acceleration problem is arguably a serious safety defect. However and again, it is up to the administrative judge at the lemon law hearing to make that decision.

Published on:

In 1992, Congress passed a law that requires the implementation of a national database that contains a car history report of every vehicle found in the United States. The database is called the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS).

Eighteen (18) years later in 2008, it looks like the Justice Department finally decided that it will abide by Congress’ order (in this case, it took lawsuits from consumer groups to get the Justice Department to finally do its job).

I just received an email update from a California Lemon Law attorney, Craig Patrick, about California being one of the frontier states that is currently participating in this national database program. The NMVTIS will contain information about the whether the vehicle was a lemon law buyback or whether it has been severely wrecked.

Published on:

I was researching on Ford‘s Lemon Law statistics yesterday and stumbled upon an interesting article relating to Ford’s Lemon Law buyback and repurchase policies on vehicles. The attached Ford response occurred toward the end of 1995 and was sparked by a petition filed against Ford by consumer groups via the Federal Trade Commission.

In this article, Ford answers some questions regarding its buyback policies and compliance with various state lemon law requirements. The article reveals that in 1994, Ford pays its dealers (including Lincoln-Mercury) approximately $400 to $700 per vehicle repurchase or buyback. Of course, this figure may have increased now since it is currently well over a decade from 1994.

The article further states Ford’s denial against claims that it participates in lemon laundering. In the article, Ford admits that approximately 95% of its lemon law buyback or replacement vehicles ends up in auction, whereby it will later be re-introduced back to the stream of commerce and in the hands of consumers in the pre-owned or used car markets.

Published on:

With the substantial increase in fuel costs, the momentum of demand for hybrid and electric cars will also exponentially increase. Inevitably, my Texas Lemon Law Office have received at least one call from a potential client per month regarding a problematic or broken lemon hybrid vehicle.

While surfing the internet for technical service bulletins (TSBs) this morning, I stumbled upon a website that contains a list of car problems that owners of the Toyota Prius recently experienced. The problems range anywhere from fuel system, airbag, dashboard,…to interior lighting.

For more information about this website that contains “unofficial lemon information on the Toyota Prius,” go here.

Published on:

At the North American International Auto Show several weeks ago, Toyota ironically displayed a lemon/lime colored sub-compact concept hybrid vehicle. I hope that the color of this vehicle is not a foreshadow that the model will become a new strand of lemon cars.

The vehicle is said to be a smaller version of Toyota’s best selling hybrid vehicle, the Prius. It is measured to be approximately 22 inches shorter than the current Prius. Toyota executives stated that they plan to introduce this vehicle to consumers in several years.

Currently, Toyota is dealing with a massive recall regarding abnormal surge and acceleration found in several of its current vehicles. If you own a new Toyota and have experienced this problem, it is recommended that you contact a lemon law attorney as soon as possible.

Published on:

Previous AT&T chief executive officer (CEO) Ed Whitacre is officially General Motor‘s (GM’s) current and hopefully permanent CEO. Whitacre served as GM’s pro tem CEO — after GM’s board of directors fired Fritz Henderson about 2 months ago on December 1, 2009.

Mr. Whitacre comes from a heavy manufacturing experience. He is known by his former colleagues to lead with a “heavy hand.”

I hope this announcement will equate to the production of less faulty and defective lemon General Motor vehicles. Whitacre will be GM’s fourth hired CEO in less than twelve months.

Published on:

Several months ago, I posted a blog article about General Motors’ (GM) newly announced sixty (60) day satisfaction guarantee program. According to GM’s frequently asked questions (FAQ) web-page, it looks like the program, which started on September 14, 2009, will now be set to expire in about 9 days from today, on January 4, 2010.

If you are interested in taking advantage of GM’s satisfaction guarantee program, here are some things to keep in mind:

1) make sure all documents signed at the time of purchase is signed on or BEFORE January 4, 2010. When you are negotiating pass closing hours the night of January 4, 2010, make sure that the dealership does not mis-date or intentionally leave the date space blank. Failure to do so may give GM the opportunity to argue that your purchase of the Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, or Cadillac may not be eligible for a refund under the program guidelines. Remember, the car dealership and GM (the manufacturer) are likely two different companies, when something goes wrong, the potential for finger pointing is high here.

Contact Information